Tag:
King James
Some of the old manuscripts favoured by modern scholars leave out or alter some of the most important passages which declare that our Redeemer is equal and co-eternal with God, and that He is Himself “God manifest in the flesh”. This great testimony in 1 Timothy 3.16 is weakened or lost in nearly every modern version. In many also the testimony of Mark 1.1 is lost, where in the Authorised Version we read “The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God”. The modern versions tend to omit or question the statement that He is “the Son of God” (see also John 6.69 and 9.35). In Hebrews 1.8, God the Father addresses the Son as God: “Unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever”. In many modern versions this testimony is weakened or lost.
No other version has taken its place in this respect. The greatest evangelists and expositors of the last 350 years have used this version for their ministries, and by means of it God has blessed millions of people with the light and truth of the Gospel of Christ.
There are hundreds of thousands of Christian people in Africa, India, the Far East and the West Indies, who use this version and want no other. During recent years, the Trinitarian Bible Society has sent hundreds of thousands of copies of the Authorised Version into Africa, where it is read by Africans whose language is English. It is the Bible they know and love, and from which the Gospel is preached to them.
Why this Message – on a 400 year-old Book? A simple answer: To inform, edify and provide for possible witness opportunities.
A Christian friend recently emailed me an article by Peter Hitchens of The Daily Mail about The Authorized Version. This article is a comment on the 400th anniversary of the 1611 Holy Bible, for which a special trust has been set up with HRH Charles the Prince of Wales as Patron.
Why this Story – about a 400 year-old Book? A simple answer: Because of its effect on: (1) the nation’s leaders; (2) the nation’s life; (3) the nation’s enemies.
(1) The nation’s leaders. e.g. HRH Charles, the Prince of Wales. This is an American Independent KJB Baptist pastor quoting The Daily Telegraph, Dec. 20, 1989, no. 41,832, his emphases.
We continue with an outline of how that glorious British Protestant Bible came into being. None can introduce better the overall incentive for the work than the learned men, the King James translators themselves, according to the preface to the 1611 Holy Bible, entitled The Translators To The Reader as the following extract shows:
With James having granted the Puritans’ petition, the next step was to choose the translators. The ones eventually chosen could be summed up as:
Two of James 1st’s most trusted advisers were Richard Bancroft, Bishop of London and later Archbishop of Canterbury and Robert Cecil, who became the Earl of Salisbury. The king charged them with appointing the men to compile the new bible and by the end of summer 1604 they had selected a total of 47 scholars for the work. As indicated, these 47 scholars were both high and low churchmen.
19th century historian Alexander McClure wrote this, his emphases: “As to the capability of those men, we may say again, that, by the good providence of God, their work was undertaken in a fortunate time. Not only had the English language…then ripened to its full perfection, but the study of Greek, and of the oriental tongues [including Hebrew], and of rabbinical [Jewish] lore, had then been carried to a greater extent in England than ever before or since. This particular field of learning has never been so highly cultivated among English divines [scholars] as it was at that day…All the colleges of Great Britain and America, even in this proud day of boastings, could not bring together the same number of divines equally qualified by learning and piety for the great undertaking.”
Briefly, what did they have to work with and how did they carry out their task?
As American researcher Norman Ward has said, “The translators of 1611 had substantially the same selection of readings from which to choose as did the revisers of 1881 [RV], 1952 [RSV], 1973 [NIV] and 1979 [NKJV].”
We move now briefly to consider the welter of criticisms that have been leveled at the 1611 Holy Bible.
The 1611 Holy Bible has received an avalanche of criticism in the last 400 years from a legion of critics, “My name is legion: for we are many” Mark 5:9. That Book and its critics are well described in a poem entitled: The Anvil Of God’s Word.
We now address our final question, what happened to the 1611 Holy Bible after 1611 and on to the present?
The question arises, was the Authorized Version ever officially authorized?
Dr Laurence Vance notes that Dr Miles Smith states in The Translators To The Reader that King James 1st “gave order for this Translation” that became the 1611 Holy Bible. Dr Vance concludes, rightly that the 1611 Holy Bible is indeed authorized because according to Ecclesiastes 8:4, “Where the word of a king is, there is power: and who may say unto him, What doest thou?”
Topics 
- A Five Pointer
- Absolute Predestination
- Church Discipline
- Compendium of Baptist History
- Entreating Churches to Maintain Discipline
- Gadsby's Hymns
- Jewell Smith Lectures
- Martyrs Mirror
- New Directory for Baptist Churches
- Plain Reasons for the AV
- Restricted Communion: Governor of Correct Church Practice
- The Authorised Version: Safeguard of the Gospel
- The Baptist Witness
- The Earthen Vessel
- The Eldership
- • Authorised Version (KJV)
- • Doctrines of Grace
- • History
- • Pastor and Deacons
- • Restricted Communion
- • The Church
- • Videos
Websites 
- Pages
- Archives